Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Don Smucker (dws_jmc![]() |
|
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 05:03:43 -0700 (PDT) |
According to Concorde, the RG and AGM batteries are the same thing. This from the Concorde site.
The RG-35AXC Aircraft Battery From
Concorde Battery Corporation
The RG-35AXC is a Concorde Platinum Series Aircraft Battery. The
Platinum Series is comprised of premium hand made AGM Aircraft
Batteries with excess power for many applications.RG-35AXC Battery Specifications:
Primary Aircraft Purpose | General Aviation AGM Aircraft Battery |
Voltage | 12v |
Rated Capacity C1 = 1 hr. rate in ampere hours |
33.00 |
Cold Cranking Amps | 440.0 |
Max Weight | 32.00 lb / 14.5 kg |
Concorde Battery Part Number |
Ipp | Ipr | Ipp | Ipr | Ipp | Ipr |
23°C (74°F) | -18°C (0°F) | -30°C (-22°F) | ||||
A | A | A | A | A | A | |
RG-35AXC | 1200 | 900 | 800 | 700 | 625 | 550 |
Specifications subject to change without notice.
Related Information:
Printable RG-35AXC Battery Specifications
RG-35AXC Battery Outline Drawing (PDF)
RG-35AXC Transportation Information
RG-35AXC SDS
Aircraft Battery Applications:
RG-35AXC Certified Battery Installations.
Click Here to See if this Battery Fits in Your Airplane
Click Here to See if this Battery is Certified for Your Airplane
Printable RG-35AXC Battery Specifications
RG-35AXC Battery Outline Drawing (PDF)
RG-35AXC Transportation Information
RG-35AXC SDS
Aircraft Battery Applications:
RG-35AXC Certified Battery Installations.
Click Here to See if this Battery Fits in Your Airplane
Click Here to See if this Battery is Certified for Your Airplane
Description of the RG-35AXC Aircraft Battery:
RG-35AXC has the highest cranking power
and capacity in the 35 Group.
Recombinant Gas - The RG® Series are low resistance, valve regulated lead acid (VRLA) batteries.
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 6:51 AM, Don Smucker via EAA493 <eaa493 [at] fly-web.us> wrote:
I am a big believer in AGM batteries, basically the same as the Concorde (RG). I put a new AGM in the Velocity. Unfortunately, it will be some time before I can report how well it performs in that bird........
Don S
On Thursday, July 9, 2015 6:31 AM, LeRoy Anderson <landers [at] copper.net> wrote:
I put a Concorde battery in my old Cherokee and it was four years old when it went down in Corsicana. The new Cherokee has a Concorde and it is almost five years old. I do a full discharge capacity test on it at every annual and it is just as good as new, so far. The battery box stays clean as a whistle between annuals. I vote for the Concorde. They do warn that you should not use your old car charger to ensure longevity and I would check your alternator voltage to make sure it does not get over or under charged in the plane. That's my experience up to now.
LeRoy
Sent from my iPad
Sent from my iPad
I need to replace a Gill G-25S which is less than two years old. They have been discontinued and replaced with a new model Gill sealed battery.I checked various forums on the internet and found that the majority of owners think that the more expensive Concorde battery is actually cheaper in the long run because it lasts longer and may actually improve with age.The Aviation Consumer article found that in their testing that the Concorde battery was more robust, holding up well to abuse like overcharging, and actually improved its capacity as it went through charging cycles. Some owners did have Concorde batteries fail in less than 2 years (around 22%) while Gill battery owners had a failure rate of 78% in less than 2 years.Here is the same article as published in the Aviation Consumer with additional surveys attached.Gill used to be the standard in wet cell batteries and those batteries still hold up well if you can stand replacing battery boxes every time one spills sulfuric acid.What has your experience been with batteries?Don
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.fly-web.us/mailman/options/eaa493/landers%40copper.net
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.fly-web.us/mailman/options/eaa493/dws_jmc%40yahoo.com
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.fly-web.us/mailman/options/eaa493/dws_jmc%40yahoo.com
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.fly-web.us/mailman/options/eaa493/dws_jmc%40yahoo.com
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.fly-web.us/mailman/options/eaa493/dws_jmc%40yahoo.com
- Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy?, (continued)
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Chase Snodgrass, July 8 2015
- Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Gerald Hatch, July 9 2015
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? LeRoy Anderson, July 9 2015
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Don Smucker, July 9 2015
- Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Don Smucker, July 9 2015
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Don Smucker, July 9 2015
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Chase Snodgrass, July 8 2015
-
Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Joe Christian, July 9 2015
- Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? R. Steve, July 9 2015
- Re: Which Battery Brand is the better buy? Don Baker, July 9 2015
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.