AlamoPA Mailing List: Fw: The Oil of Alaska

[Sallie Carlson (wacsc11945]

----- Forwarded Message -----

From: Lois Anderson <glois [at] verizon.net>

To: 'Lori Beck' <loribeck15 [at] icloud.com>; 'Linda' <lindasjuice [at] aol.com>; 'Judy Pariseau' <camiolady [at] gmail.com>; 'Sallie Carlson' <wacsc11945 [at] yahoo.com>

Sent: Saturday, October 8, 2022 at 06:51:39 PM CDT

Subject: FW: The Oil of Alaska

 

 

Subject: Fwd: Fw: The Oil of Alaska



 

 

REMEMBER

If you forward this, please remove email

addresses before you send it on, and use the

BCC area when addressing to several people at once.

 

 

  I'm including my brother's comments because I feel he is very knowledgeable on the subject, having been a supervisor at Chevron for many years.

 

The maps and pictures at the end tell the story.

 

My brother:

I think everything said is pretty much true, although I’m not sure about the quantity of oil he states.  However, the big problem is that the “greenies” don’t want new drilling anywhere (not just Alaska).  Unfortunately, our President is trying to make the far left happy by stopping pipelines and limiting exploration in the U.S. while asking Saudi Arabia to increase production to help bring down the price of oil.  

Then, finally, in desperation, he encourages oil companies to spend billions of dollars to increase exploration and production temporarily while at the same time saying over the coming years, we’re going to reduce our oil consumption by orders of magnitude. 

At least many Democrats are now bad-mouthing Biden for his reckless actions and statements.  

That's some of my 2 cents

 

 

Subject: The Oil of Alaska. 

Sent for educational purposes only. This may not fit exactly into the direction that the country is being driven today, but considering the impact to-date, maybe we should not have pulled the plug too quickly.  At any rate, looking at the impact on inflation, maybe we should have adopted a transition stage. 

Pictures to aid your thought process versus what you see and hear from the mainstream media.  Anyway, for those of you with differing views, as I said, for educational purposes. I know, I know, but please don’t shoot the messenger.

Friend and former Shell technical manager.

WELL, AL GORE

My daughter and son-in-law were in L.A last week from their home in Anchorage. He is a foreman in the oil fields at AMWR. He flies his own plane to the job where he spends months at a time in the most God forsaken place this side of Siberia. He confirmed everything that is in this story, and brought dozens of pictures for proof. Our environmentalist friends have forced gas prices up to an impossible rate, forcing us to buy oil from our enemies, for whatever untruthful reason. There is enough oil in AMWR to supply the US at our present rate of usage for more than 200 years. The space that AMWR occupies in Alaska is equivalent to a postage stamp in the Mojave Desert . If you won't mind paying $6.00 a gallon, try to make sense of the following: This is the best presentation on ANWR I have seen. I would like to add a little more information. A new pipeline across Alaska isn't required since the location for drilling in ANWR is about 160 miles from the North Slope Prudhoe Bay pipeline where it would be connected. I did not know this. Second the wildlife love the pipeline since it is heated and provides a shelter during the worst times during the winter. Maybe another question should be asked FIRST do you know what ANWR is? ANSWER: Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Now A comparison  And some perspective?   NOTE WHERE THE PROPOSED                                                                                                                                         DEVELOPMENT AREA IS?  (it's in the "ANWR Coastal Plain") THIS IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS, LIBERALS AND "GREENS" SHOW YOU WHEN THEY TALK ABOUT ANWR and they are right these ARE photographs of ANWR    ISN'T ANWR BEAUTIFUL? WHY SHOULD WE DRILL HERE (AND DESTROY) THIS BEAUTIFUL PLACE? WELL THAT'S NOT EXACTLY THE TRUTH Do you remember the map? The map showed that the proposed drilling area is in the ANWR Coastal Plain Do those photographs look like a coastal plain to you? WHAT'S GOING ON HERE? THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE THAT IS NOT WHERE THEY ARE WANTING TO DRILL! THIS IS WHAT THE PROPOSED EXPLORATION AREA ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE IN THE WINTER   AND THIS IS WHAT IT ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE IN THE SUMMER   HERE ARE A COUPLE SCREEN SHOTS FROM GOOGLE EARTH   AS YOU CAN SEE, THE AREA WHERE THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT DRILLING IS A BARREN WASTELAND.   OH--AND THEY SAY THAT THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE EFFECT ON THE LOCAL WILDLIFE?   HERE IS A PHOTO (SHOT DURING THE SUMMER) OF THE "DEPLETED WILDLIFE" SITUATION CREATED BY DRILLING AROUND PRUDHOE BAY * DON'T YOU THINK THAT THE CARIBOU REALLY HATE THAT DRILLING?    HERE'S THAT SAME SPOT DURING THE WINTER.   HEY, THIS BEAR SEEMS TO REALLY HATE THE PIPELINE NEAR PRUDHOE BAY *   *The Prudhoe Bay area accounts for 17% of the U.S. domestic oil production NOW, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT THE DEMOCRATS ARE LYING ABOUT ANWR? REMEMBER WHEN AL GORE SAID THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD WORK TO ARTIFICIALLY RAISE GAS PRICES TO $5.00 A GALLON? WELL, AL GORE AND HIS FELLOW DEMOCRATS HAVE  MORE THAN REACHED THEIR GOAL!   FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW SO THAT THEY WILL KNOW THE TRUTH.