Fw: Fwd: Letter from a senior FBI agent to Director Comey fm Boop | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Sallie Carlson (wacsc11945![]() |
|
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2016 19:32:02 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Robert Ahrenkiel <gp-bob11 [at] att.net>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 6:44 PM
Subject: Fw: Fwd: Letter from a senior FBI agent to Director Comey fm Boop
According to Truth of fiction this letter is still under investigation
as they try to confirm it was Hugh that wrote this letter. I truly
agree with the contents. How does the FBI director who decides
criminal action. That is for the court to decide.
.
.
Sent: Sunday, October 16, 2016 2:07:01 PM
Subject: Letter from a senior FBI agent to Director Comey
Subject: Letter from a senior FBI agent to Director Comey
Letter from a senior FBI agent to Director Comey
Not that it matters anymore....but the American public should know, not all sits well within our FBI after Comey did what he did for HRC and the administration.Subject: Letter to Comey from former FBI AgentSeptember 2, 2016
Mr. James Comey, Director
Federal Bureau of Investigation
J. Edgar Hoover Building
935 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20535-0001Sir,
I am writing regarding your public statement in July, 2016 informing
the American people that the FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton was
being closed without referring it to a Federal Grand Jury or the
Attorney General of the U. S. for a decision whether or not to indict her.
Strangely, you eloquently laid out enough of the evidence deduced
from the investigation to strongly indicate there was abundant
evidence uncovered during the investigation and interview of her to
not only indict but to convict her in Federal Court. However, you personallyre-worded and soft-pedaled the actions she took as Secretary of State describingher actions as "extremely careless" in using a personal email and un-securedserver for her communications while Secretary of State. You rewrote the statute,which is not your job.As a retired Special Agent of the FBI, I have standing to write this
letter. My thirty years in law enforcement, including 22 years as a
Special Agent with the FBI have given me the knowledge, expertise and
experience to question and confront you for your perplexing actions,
which (as you well know) were outside the normal standard operating
procedure of the FBI and Federal judicial procedures. Some of the
finest people in the world proudly carry the credentials of FBI Agent
and you have soiled them and not allowed them to speak. But I will not be
silent.Sorry, but NO SIR, MS Clinton was not merely careless or extremely
careless. She was not even negligent or grossly negligent (as the
statute requires). Hillary Clinton was knowingly purposeful in her
decisions and actions to set up a server under her exclusive control
and possession in order to control what information was available to
the American public and Congress regarding her actions as Secretary
of State. Furthermore, she took those government owned communications
into her personal possession after leaving her position and knowingly
and willingly attempted to destroy them so her nefarious actions
could never be known or used as evidence of her corrupt moral character
against her.
Sir, what possessed you? Did you cave in to political pressure to
unilaterally come to this decision? I fear that is the case, and Rule
of Law be damned. I am embarrassed for and ashamed of you. You have
set a precedent that can never be rectified?.and certainly not
justified. Shame on you, Sir. You ought to resign right now in
disgrace for what you have done to tarnish the reputation of the
finest Law Enforcement Agency in the world?. for entirely political
reasons.Normally, an investigation will be assigned to an agent, or team of
agents with one being the Case agent, or the lead investigator. When
the investigation is complete, an investigative report will be
presented to the U.S. Attorney for the Federal District involved. It
would be the U.S. Attorney who decides whether to decline prosecution
for that investigation?.NOT the FBI agent. But in the Clinton
investigation, YOU (unilaterally) decided not to forward the investigation
to the U.S. Attorney or the Attorney General of the U.S. but, instead,
personally made the decision not to prosecute her or even provide the
information to a Federal Grand Jury. You were wrong to take this upon
yourself.
Sir, in order to indict a subject, only a preponderance of evidence ,
or 51% is needed for probable cause to exist. You did not think even
that level of probability existed? Who do you think you are fooling?
What judicial proceeding did you think you were following?Throughout my years with the FBI, I (along with my fellow agents)
took great pride in conducting each investigation in an unbiased
manner regardless of the subjects position or standing in the
community. All were treated equally under the law. But you, Sir,
decided to allow this corrupt, evil and nasty human being to go free
and unchallenged for her treasonous actions (yes, treasonous, in my
opinion) which threatened the security of this nation. Furthermore,
you stopped short of investigating the Clinton Foundation as a RICO
case (Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization. This is a
RICO case if there ever was one. Even an untrained person can tell
from the communications which were recovered that Hillary Clinton
spent more time working for the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of
State than on State Business. It may be argued that Hillary did not
do any State business UNLESS the Clinton Foundation benefited. You
decided to just let this uncomfortable truth alone without addressing it.I will conclude with this: Following my retirement from the FBI, I
volunteered for a 12 month tour of duty in Afghanistan as a Law
Enforcement Professional, embedded with U.S. forces as a subject
matter expert in counter-terrorism investigations. For most of that
year I operated ?outside the wire? patrolling with the troops,
interviewing witnesses to IED incidents and gathering evidence on the
bad guys. The results of my work would then be reported through
secure channels to the Commanding Officer. All reports and
communications were required to be transmitted via secure and
encrypted devices. Occasionally my remote location in the mountains
of Afghanistan made transmission impossible and I would have to fly back
to Bagram Air Base in order to securely report to the Commander of the
battle space. It would have been convenient if I could have just called the
Commander on my personal cell phone or written him an email on my personal
laptop. But, had I done so I would have been reporting classified
information via an unsecured device and it could have been compromised. These were, relative to
Secretary of State communications, low level classifications of
Secret. Had I ever sent even one in such a manner I would have been
prosecuted and sent to Federal Prison for 20 years or so. That is
how serious this violation is considered.Now, because of you, Hillary Clinton is allowed to continue her RICO
activities and is running for President of the United States, the
most powerful position in the world. You have trampled on the Rule
of Law and destroyed the trust of the American people in the FBI and
in unbiased enforcement of the law. How do you sleep at night? It is
time for you to go and work for the Clinton Foundation.
Sincerely,
Hugh W. Galyean
(FBI Agent, Retired)
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies Web hosting using MHonArc.